IPP’s Explanation of Electron Capture
(Excerpted from page 4-26 to 4-29 of online book, Infinite Particle Physics.)
Electron Capture ―How Electron & Proton Interact to produce
a Neutron plus Nue
In Fig. 4-23, I gave a
rudimentary explanation of the beta minus decay of 36Kr85 to 37Rb85, suggesting
that the process was effected by a charge-exchange between an outrigger neutron
and a visiting void-pair, yielding a proton plus an electron. Now, let’s look
closely at the inverse process, an electron charge-exchanging with a proton to
produce a neutron plus a void-pair. Here are some necessary sub-details of this
scenario:
Fig. 4-32 Charge-Exchange Electron-Splitting: p + e → n + nue

Conversion Analysis Of Fig.
4-32: We shall suppose that an electron’s center
passes just a few lattice units away from the +x defect of a proton, while this
proton is in its p1 state, as shown above (9ü, 9ü, 9ü spacings, mass 933.11 MeV).
We shall also suppose that there is sufficient momentary local undedicated
shrinkage to “split” the electron into -void & -excess components, as
shown, and that the electron’s strong charge-presence interrupts the proton’s
internal charge-exchange sequence, and induces an external charge-exchange with
the split electron. Due to the huge mass disparity between the electron’s
components (–void <<1meV, –excess ≈ 52.5 MeV), only the –void
enters into the charge-exchange, while the –excess moves slowly outwardly,
because of the mutual repulsion of the two split components.
Now,
when the electron’s –void component undergoes its charge-exchange with this +x
defect, the result is a -c-void 1ü closer to the particle center, as shown by
the dotted tab. This change converts the proton to a neutron in its low-mass n1
state (spacings 8ü, 9ü, 9ü, mass 866.93 MeV), releasing momentary shrinkage in
the amount of 933.11 - 866.93 = 66.18 MeV. This shrinkage sustains the –excess
component of the split electron long enough for the +void, released by the
charge exchange, to be attracted outwardly towards it.
Where Does The Electron Splitting Energy Come From? The most plausible
source for the 52.5 MeV of mass-energy required for momentary –muon creation is
in the proton → neutron conversion process, itself. We can find clues for
this possibility by looking at Figs. 2-8 & 2-9 on page 2-10 & 11, where
I show the masses of the various charge-exchange states of the proton &
neutron. Notice that, although the average mass of the six neutron states
exceeds that of the proton by 939.57 – 938.28 = 1.29 MeV, three of the neutron
states are much lower mass than the proton (p1) states:
State #5 (p1
→ n2-lo) = 933.11 – 874.69 = 58.42 MeV
State #6 (p1
→ n1-lo) = 933.11 – 866.93 = 66.18 MeV
State #1 (p1
→ n1-lo) = 933.11 – 866.93 = 66.18 MeV
You will see that these
mass-energy differences exceed our requirement (52.5 MeV) for creating a –muon
from the electron’s –excess component, so the potential exists for freeing the
electron’s –void to undergo a charge-exchange with one of the proton’s +c-voids,
providing this exchange causes the resulting neutron to begin its charge-exchange
cycle with one of its low-mass states. Of course, there is the usual Heisenberg
cart-before-the-horse problem, where the muon-creating shrinkage must appear
before the resulting neutron’s charge-exchange makes it available, so we must
look to other processes in the immediate vicinity for the source of this
shrinkage. Here is a possibility:
Ambient Neutrons Provide The Initiating Mass-Energy: Neutrons
in the immediate vicinity of this proton obviously will be undergoing six-state
charge-exchange cycles. Half of these states will be successive lo-n1, lo-n2,
& lo-n1 states. Hence, during this half of the charge-exchange cycle, there
will be excess (undedicated) shrinkage in the proton’s vicinity equal to the
neutron mass minus the average mass of these states, or:
939.57 – (2 x 866.93 +8.72.69) / 3 = 70.72 MeV
Several Outcomes are to be Expected in p → n
Conversions: This neutron-producing charge-exchange
scenario may seem straightforward up to this point, but in considering the
interaction between the outwardly moving +void and the lingering –excess
component, I find it hard to choose among several alternatives: